Monday, December 29, 2008

Israel’s New War: Stopping Attacks or Gaining Back Lost Reputation?

It feels like the same war Israel carried out against Lebanon in 2006 again. Doesn’t it? Bombardments, slaughter, complete destruction and civilian killings—all under the banner of “fighting the terrorists.”

So what is Israel trying to say in this war? Gaining its reputation it lost back in 2006 after Hezbullah triumphed, became more powerful and now became part of the Lebanese government? Or is it truly trying to stop Hamas’ attacks against its civilians?

I blame the carnage and the horrible death of the Palestinian civilians on both sides. Israel is so arrogant and indifferent to human rights that it had been slaughtering millions of civilians since it was created in the recent history and this war is no different than any of its former ones. And Hamas is even worse. Instead of laying weapons down and creating a stable and indepndent state along with the other Palestinian political factions, they have put their own people in this situation where they knew that messing up with Israel would lead to such a war. None of the both sides have actually thought about human rights and that of course led to the death of civilians on both lands.

Now, what are we going to make of this whole mess? More violence to happen, of course. Hatred will also increase against the Israelis across the Arab world- as if it has not been enough- and the fact that having a peaceful atmosphere in that regions seems moving farther and farther.

So what’s the solution to stop this carnage now? There isn’t, I guess. Israel has managed to break Hamas’ backbone. But what about the innocent civilians who lost their loved ones? Won’t they grow up with the will to take revenge, like those in Iraq and Lebanon? Doesn’t violence breed violence? And wasn’t that what has been happnening in that region since ever?

Blog.bassamsebti@gmail.com

Monday, December 15, 2008

Instead of Roses, Iraqi throws shoes at Bush

I’m sure you all have seen what happened yesterday when the Iraqi reporter threw his shoes at the soon-to-leave American president. I have to say I was surprised. I had mixed feelings and didn’t know if I should laugh or not.

Professionally as a journalist myself, I found what the reporter did was extremely wrong. Journalists have their voices and pens (and now the internet) to express whatever they want to protest against. However, I was kind of relieved. As an Iraqi citizen, I believe Bush deserved this ending that the entire world will remember and cherish. I mean what the wrong the man had done was huge. His failure to prepare for an invasion aftermath caused Iraqis and Americans hundreds of thousands of souls, not to mention the destruction of an entire country, the millions who have migrated and the creation of terrorism in Iraq. Well, you know the rest. There is no need to go into details here.

When I saw the video, all I could think of was what Bush will do for the rest of his life after he leaves the White House. Will he ever be respected? Remembered for at least a good thing he did? Now, the republicans will say, “But he removed Saddam!” and then I’ll reply, “and brought hundreds of Saddams instead and destroyed an entire functioning country.”
One of my colleagues at work who is not a supporter of Bush said despite his opposition to Bush, he started feeling sorry for him. I told him he shouldn’t. This man- whether he intended it or because he’s stupid- has been nothing but a bad thing in this world. I don’t even think he really understands how gravely disastrous what he has done in harming Iraqis and Americans. Thanks to Obama the world started believing in America again.

The reaction in the Arab world was expected. Extreme happiness and appreciation to what the reporter did. Iraqis have even created a facebook group right after the incident, praising the reporter and calling him "hero." This morning, the number of the group members was around 900. Now it’s far more and is increasing. Also, a crazy Saudi wealthy man offered to buy the shoes for $10 Million. In addition to that, Arab people started exchanging jokes via email and cell phones. One of the jokes reads, “A new presidential order says no journalist attends a press conference wearing shoes.”

Anyways, now Bush has one last thing to have the world remember him with. If I were him… Nah, I’ll keep this to myself. lol

Friday, November 14, 2008

Sticky Bombs

When I called my mother last week, she said everybody is worried because of the increase of ‘al-lasiqa,’ a term I have not heard of before I left Baghdad in July 2006. I asked what that is and she said it’s a sticky bomb usually put under the car.

For those who do not know what the sticky bomb is, read this New York Times article about it and how insurgents are using it in Iraq.

Thursday, November 13, 2008

Proud and Grateful

Last night my employer the International Center for Journalists (ICFJ) held its annual Awards Dinner. Several awards were granted to some outstanding journalists who covered wars, disasters, and government abuse all over the world.

The International Center for Journalists is a non-profit, professional organization that promotes quality journalism worldwide in the belief that independent, vigorous media are crucial in improving the human condition. Aiming to raise the standards of journalism, ICFJ offers hands-on training workshops, seminars, fellowships and international exchanges to journalists and media managers around the globe.

At the Awards Dinner, pioneering editor and free-press champion Aliaksei Karol of Belarus and human rights investigative reporter Frank Nyakairu of Uganda received Knight International Journalism Award. And the London Bureau Chief for The New York Times John F. Burns received the ICFJ Founders Award for Excellence in Journalism. Christiane Amanpour presented the keynote address and ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos was the master of ceremonies

In honor of Burns, the ICFJ decided to offer a financial award to an Iraqi journalist who covered the war and proved excellence in his/her career. When the ICFJ Vice President asked me my opinion during the preparation for the dinner, I couldn’t but think of Jehad Ali. As a cameraman for the Iraqi state television, Al-Iraqiya, Ali roamed the streets in search of stories along with the channel’s reporters. One day and as he was going to work a group of armed men cordoned off the street and started shooting at him. As he fell wounded, one of the insurgents wanted to finish him off. Bullets penetrated through most of his body leaving him very close to death.

I knew about Ali through the CPJ which posted his journey from Baghdad to the United States to have certain surgeries that cannot be done in Iraq due to the collapse of the health and medical system there. Although we are an organization that basically deals with training opportunities around the globe, I thought that by giving Ali the award we would be saving his life to bring him back to his job. That, I considered, was similar to training him to work again.


Jehad Ali from Dave Mayers on Vimeo.

When Jehad’s name was announced in the Awards Dinner, I felt very proud. It was not because I chose him, but because there are people who do appreciate the danger and the risk Iraqi journalists are going through every day in their lives. I felt proud because I’m from a country where people are brave, a country that has journalists like Ali, Salih, Othman, Khalid, and many others.

Now with Ali receiving his award in honor of John F. Burns, it has become an annual thing where every year an Iraqi journalist is going to have the opportunity to receive a fund to be trained in journalism. This left me extremely happy and grateful to all of the efforts that are being done to make journalism in Iraq move towards the right path of quality journalism.

blog.bassamsebti@gmail.com

Cyber Terrorism Criminalized in Pakistan

On November 10, 2008, Pakistani president Asif Ali Zardari approved the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Ordinance 2008, a new law to combat cyber terrorism in his country.

The text law reads:
"Whoever commits the offence of cyber terrorism and causes death of any person shall be punishable with death or imprisonment for life and with fine and in any other case he shall be punishable with imprisonment of either description for at erm which may extend to ten years, or with fine not less than ten-million rupees, or with both."

"Any person, group or organization who, with terroristic intent utilizes, accesses or causes to be accessed a computer or computer network or electronic system or electronic device or by any available means, and thereby knowingly engages in or attempts to engage in a terroristic act commits the offence of cyber terrorism."

As far as I’m concerned, I believe that this law is one of the good means in combating terrorism. We all know how the internet played a big role in spreading terrorist propaganda and how powerful this means is. So having it criminalized might help limit such acts and also lead to catching terrorists.

However, this law might be used for other means. It could be used in restricting the freedom of people using the internet and give excuse to authorities to monitor people’s personal emails or get access to their computers.

I hope such laws will be considered in other countries, but they should not violate the personal rights of the regular citizens as it will turn into censorship, not terrorism combating.

blog.bassamsebti@gmail.com

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

"This is Your Victory"

Like millions across the world, I was glued to the TV last night. CNN did an incredible job in covering the elections night. When Obama was announced the elect president I jumped off the couch and the first words I uttered were, “I have a huge respect for this country.”

Indeed, Obama’s victory was a victory to the entire world that has become fed up and tired of Bush’s policies. Looking at Obama taking the stage and addressing his supporters in Chicago left me with a great feeling that this man changed the history of America. Now change can be good and bad. Bush and his administration did their part (bad of course) but Obama represented the good change. He wrote history like Martin Luther King and the founding fathers. All I could think of at that moment was how great the American democracy is and how the American people moved to the next step which should have been done way earlier. Nevertheless, they did it. They forgot about their race differences and finally voted for an African American. American democracy has entirely become the model of all democracies around the world.

Obama’s speech was very moving. The very first sentence made me respect him even more.
If there is anyone out there who still doubts that America is a place where all things are possible, who still wonders if the dream of our founders is alive in our time, who still questions the power of our democracy, tonight is your answer.
Last night’s victory was indeed the answer to all those who had ever suspected American democracy. As for McCain, as much as I didn’t like him, as much as I highly respected him after hearing his speech. I commend him for his respectful speech. His words showed he was not a loser but someone who truly loves his country.

There are no enough words to put on this thread. So I’ll just say that last night was a historic moment not only for the United States, but for the entire world. I am glad I had the chance to witness that great event in my lifetime. The entire world looks to America differently now. They see the new great, bright face of America, not what they used to see for the last eight years. Obama’s victory brought the world together to love America again.

blog.bassamsebti@gmail.com

Thursday, October 23, 2008

What if Obama was Arab or Muslim?

American society has often been described as a melting pot. It has become a great nation by its people's will and desire to live, work and build as they work hard to achieve their American dream. But what is happening now by some conservative Americans as they support McCain is extremely hurting this great image of the American dream, which is the essence of what America is all about. Expressing their racism and intolerance publically while rallying for McCain is just sad.

I'm sure all of you saw this ignorant American woman rallying for McCain saying she doesn't trust Obama and that she has "read about him and found out he's an Arab." At first, I thought she said "he's an error" which is why I accepted McCain saying, "No, Madam. He's a decent family man…" But when I realized she meant an "Arab" and connected it to what McCain said, I felt very offended. It appeared as if he was saying, "No, Madam. He's is decent, not Arab." I wonder if he said that deliberately to convey that Arabs are not decent and that since Obama is not an Arab, he's decent!

In all cases, I'm not surprised that this came from a McCain supporter and from McCain himself. I wonder what would the Arab Americans feel when they heard this ignorant woman. What would they think when they see the country they built along with their Christian, Jewish, Buddhist, atheist and Hindu countrymen intolerant like this. Haven't they defended their country like what Kareem Rashad Sultan Khan did when he enlisted in the army, deployed in Iraq and then killed there? What would his heart-wrenched father say when he sees or hears ignorant people disregarding his son's sacrifice for his country and faith?

I guess no one said it better than Campbell Brown in this CNN video. "What if Obama was an Arab or a Muslim… What if McCain was?"

This election is a wakeup call for Americans and how they are going to shape their country. I hope they do it the right way this time, unlike what happened when they voted for Bush whose eight years brought destruction, caused many enemies around the world and most importantly used the people's taxes to pay for wars and let the entire American economy collapse before the American people's eyes.

Now, it is time for change. And yes, you can!

blog.bassamsebti@gmail.com

Friday, October 3, 2008

Infrastructure and jobs or entertainment programs?

From today's Washington Post:



The Defense Department will pay private U.S. contractors in Iraq up to $300 million over the next three years to produce news stories, entertainment programs and public service advertisements for the Iraqi media in an effort to "engage and inspire" the local population to support U.S. objectives and the Iraqi government.
All I want to say here is that Iraqis do not need entertainment programs to support U.S. objectives and the Iraqi government. They need electricity, clean water and jobs. When these things are provided, they will love the Americans and their government to death.



blog.bassamsebti@gmail.com



Tuesday, September 30, 2008

The World Through the Eyes of a Solo Reporter

I usually write my reviews about books after I finish reading them, but this time I wanted to share my opinion with you before finishing it.

This time the book is about conflict all over the world: In the Hot Zone: One Man, One Year, Twenty Wars by solo journalist, Kevin Sites. Which one of us doesn't remember the U.S. soldier's image shooting an unarmed insurgent in a mosque in Fallujah during the 2004 Fallujah battle? It was Kevin Sites who shot that controversial footage.

I bought the book from Borders bookstore a few days ago after leafing through its pages. I have heard a lot about Sites, but never had the chance to read his reports. Along with the book, came the DVD documentary "A World of Conflict," a must-see film that I watched last night.

We all know that our world is turning upside down with violence somewhere and economy collapse somewhere else. It is indeed a world of conflict which sometimes drives me to the question of whether the science-fiction movies we see about the destruction of earth would become true some day.

Watching the world's conflicts, Sites came up with an idea, a one that led to an important project: covering twenty wars in one year.

Sites' first chapter of the book and the introductory part of the documentary was about the Fallujah mosque shooting and his time in Iraq. He describes how he was labeled as a traitor by those who don't accept facts and who do not want to admit that war is ugly and that crimes happen from both fighting parties. The insurgent who was shot might deserve what had happened to him, but the way he was killed was, of course, against the ethics of fighting in war zones. It's sad to see that those who sent Sites threatening letters and text messages do not understand that he was just doing his job and had not expressed in no way ever his own, personal opinion regarding what happened. He let the world judge and it did.

I see Sites as a good example of balanced, sincere and extremely honest journalism. His words and the video footages he took in the countries he covered had an imprint of humanity. Throughout his travels as a solo journalist in conflict zones, the sense of humanity in his dispatches and reports was strongly evident, having it covered away from politics. There was a scream of horror that he wanted to let the rest of the world hear.

There were stories from Afghanistan, Nepal, Lebanon, Sri Lanka, Congo, and other places in the world. Sites was successful in detailing in a summarized way what the cause of violence was and how it took its toll on the human beings there. The things that blew me up the most were the stories from the Congo, Lebanon and Afghanistan. In the documentary he interviews a woman called Marie (not her name, as he mentions in the book). She was raped several times in front of her husband by militiamen who killed her children before her eyes and then mutilated her husband's body after killing him. The worst part was asking her to chew his cut flesh. "They use rape as a weapon of war," she told Sites. "They have guns, but this is worse than the guns." The entire interview in the documentary brought tears to my eyes.

His coverage of the Israel-Lebanon war in the summer of 2006 was noteworthy. He was there when Israel shelled entire buildings with civilians in them. The image of the woman weeping after their loved ones died and the image of the children covered with blood is unforgettable.

Reading the book now after watching the documentary makes me picture all those who were interviewed. Reading the words and comparing them to the people's faces makes my heart ache. So much violence out there, so many wars, and so much pain and sorrow in the hearts and minds of people. Like Sites, I believe this violence aims to kill civilization and most importantly humanity. The worst part of all, in my opinion, is that there are people out there benefiting from all of this, encouraging more and more violence and causing the deaths and the suffering of millions of people across our cursed planet.

blog.bassamsebti@gmail.com

Monday, September 29, 2008

Massacring Muslims Online!

Muslim Massacre is a website dedicated to a new electronic hate game that promotes killing the Muslims, their prophet and even God wherever they are. It can be downloaded for free online.

The website tells surfers that it's a game of "modern religious genocide." They are urged "not be a liberal pussy, download this now".

Reaction against that hate game was first published in the Lebanese newspaper Al-Akhbar and was translated and republished by Menassat.

blog.bassamsebti@gmail.com

Sunday, September 14, 2008

Evil Saudi Sheikh Orders Killing of TV Owners

It seems it was not enough what the Wahabis did since they hijacked Islam and Saudi Arabia, but also they continue to be the source of most of the mayhem across the Middle East. They just don't stop spreading hatred and murder for any reason they find right before their eyes.

On September 12, Saudi Arabia's Wahabi Sheikh Salih Ibn al-Luhaydan issued a fatwa live on radio permitting the killing of the owners of the satellite channels "for promoting debauchery." The killing advocate answered a question by a caller on the radio, saying, "There is no doubt that these programs are a great evil, and the owners of these channels are as guilty as those who watch them… It is legitimate to kill those who call for corruption if their evil cannot be stopped by other penalties."

One day after this evil verdict, assassins killed four TV journalists from Iraq's Al-Sharqiyah Satellite TV channel while filming a show about feeding the fasting people in the holy month of Ramadan. The show called, "Breaking Your Fast Is on Us," is a popular TV show, widely watched by many Iraqis during the holy month. The TV channel picks families who have financial difficulties and make them a huge meal of Iftar, along with other presents like house equipments, including refrigerators, stoves, ovens, TV-sets, etc.

I don't know if the killing of these journalists is linked to what that evil Sheikh issued, but it seems it's not disconnected. It's wrong, wrong, wrong and wrong and should be stopped.

Blog.bassamsebti@gmail.com

Thursday, September 4, 2008

In modern Islam, Shiites Revived and Sunnis did not like that!

A few days ago, I finished reading a very interesting book about the Middle East and more specifically about the Shiite Muslims. The Shia Revival by Vali Nasr is a must-read for all those who have no idea what the terms 'Shiite' and 'Sunni' mean. I actually recommend it more for those who are interested in knowing why there is a difference in the two terms and why was all this fuss called 'sectarian war in Iraq.'
Although I knew many things mentioned in the book, I still found that there were things I did not really know. Nasr narrates, analyzes and discusses them in details.

I have a friend in Philly who is a Shiite Muslim from Saudi Arabia's infamous Qatif city. We have always sat and discussed issues that concern our region, religion, and our lives as they are related to these things. One day, I was completely upset and mad at what I had discovered in our religion. The discussion we both had led to realizing that it's not the problem was not in the religion itself more than the practitioners of Islam themselves who used certain things and interpreted them the way they wanted them to mean. The goal is to make others believe them, and nothing other using certain things from the religion to make them believe in was better than that. During that discussion, I told my friend about my memories of Islam in Iraq. I remember leaning back on the plastic chair, saying "Our religion was simple. The war made it gross."

Indeed, it was as simple as knowing the basic things in the Quran, knowing your prophet is Mohammed and your God is Allah and that there were other prophets whom God chose to deliver his messages. Yes, there were Sunni and Shiite differences, but among the people (at least those in Baghdad whom I was one of) it was not something we really cared about. During those years, books about religion were rarely found. The secular Baathist regime made sure people in my generation do not understand or know what the real history behind the two sects was. My family did tell me that the Shiites were victimized throughout history, especially during the Abbasid Empire era, but they never really went into details about it nor they stressed on making me or my sister insist on knowing it because it was not a big deal then.

The internet revolution and the flow of the books and the articles about the real history between the two sects appeared on surface in the aftermath of the US.-led invasion of Iraq, letting me and many others in my generation be able to read and learn about that grim and gruesome history of wars and struggle to get power.

One of these books is the Shia Revival. The book opened my eyes to many things that I did not before the war. I knew it all started when Prophet Mohammed died but did not know other details, including the fight between Iran and Saddam was a Shiite-Sunni fight. I know understand why the Arab countries supported Saddam against the "Evil Persians" and why Iran went on for eight years to fight Saddam. The goal was who would dominate? The Sunnis who wanted the Arab World always be Sunni or the Shiites, represented by Iran then, who wanted to spread their faith to a larger crowd in the Arab World?

Addressing the West in his book, Nasr relates the Shiite rituals to those of the other religions. This was something that I did not really know. Nasr also talks about Saudi Arabia's Wahabism a lot. It is widely connected to the struggle between Sunnis and Shiites these days. It goes way back to the days when the Wahabis invaded the holy city of Karbala where Imam Hussein is buried and slaughtered the Shiites there, believing that they were infidels and tomb worshipers. He also writes about the Lebanon Shiites and how they emerged as a fighting and strong force in the region, making even Sunnis follow them in their fight against Israel which was occupying their land for decades. Then, came the Iran-Iraq war and the whole struggle of keeping the Shiites away from domination. There is also a long, detailed and very interesting chapter about Khomeini and his role in Shiism, followed by an interestingly-analyzed chapter about the new Iraq which he called it 'The first Shiite Arab state,' a term that I've never heard before and a one that is so true.

Overall, the book shows that the struggle is not religious more than political. Peoples from both sects were caught in the middle of this conflict. They were used and brain-washed over the decades to create differences.

Anyways, it is a wonderful book and a good source that I strongly recommend to readers interested in learning about political Islam.

The other book I'm sunk in its waters now is Robin Wright's Dreams and Shadows: the future of the Middle East.

Blog.bassamsebti@gmail.com


Wednesday, August 20, 2008

Fellow American Blogger and Friend Arrested in Beijing


My friend and fellow blogger, Brian Conley, has been arrested by the Chinese government in Beijing, the Committee to Protect Bloggers said on its website. Brian, the founder of Alive in Baghdad, was arrested while documenting the activities of New York artist James Powderly, who seems was planning a Tibet-themed event at the Olympics.

From this forum, I call on the free people in the word to raise their voice and demand the release of our friend whose media and blogging projects made a huge impact on raising the awareness in the world.

Update: (Thanks, Khalid)

In a email sent to Brian's friends and supporters, Brian's wife reported the following:
We just got word that Brian and friends are on a plane to Los Angeles, arriving Monday morning. He was released with 7 other US citizen detainees: Jeff Goldin, Tom Grant, Mike Liss, James Powderly, Jeff Rae, John Watterberg and Jeremy Wells.

blog.bassamsebti@gmail.com

Tuesday, July 22, 2008

Crisis Reporting

I have just finished reading some interesting articles by David Enders and Richard Rowley. The two are journalists reporting from Iraq for the Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting, a non-profit online journalism organization that intends to be "a leader in sponsoring the independent reporting that media organizations are increasingly less willing to undertake on their own."

The two Iraq journalists did some very good reporting. The stories they wrote on their website were short, but mighty. I thought of sharing these stories with you.

Blog.bassamsebti@gmail.com

Tuesday, July 15, 2008

Respecting Cultures Isn’t Hard

Freedom has limits. It definitely should not disrespect other cultures. Is it that hard to respect other people's culture? I guess not.

Well, I have been following the news of arresting western tourists in the United Arab Emirates for breaking the law by disrespecting the Muslim country's traditions. Earlier this month a British businesswoman was caught having sex in public on Jumeirah Beach in Dubai, hurting the feelings of the Arab and Muslim visitors. When I read the news I felt disgusted. In our culture and tradition, having sex in public is disrespecting privacy, religion, and Arab manners. It is not close-mindedness. It is culture.

When I read the story of the British businesswoman, I thought to myself, C'mon now, Are there no other private places in the entire city where you could have had sex without hurting other people's feelings? Although the city is liberal, which is a good thing, there are still things to consider: culture is one of them. It is still a Muslim country after all, and public sex is condemned because it comes against our traditions and religion. Was it that hard to perceive?

Respecting cultures comes from people's education. Before I came to the U.S. I learned as much information as I could about the American culture and how to respect people's traditions. If I hadn't done that, I could have easily disrespected people here and be condemned and spelled out of the society. It would be like me using the "N" word against the African Americans or extend my arm like Hitler did to salute the Jews. Instead, I learned how to respect other people's cultures, not only the American, but also the Indian, the Chinese, the Korean, and even fellow Muslims who sometimes differ in their traditions.

A few weeks ago I watched stand-up show on Bravo by the ill-reputed Kathy Griffin. I kind of laughed at the beginning until I noticed she was going far beyond humor. She talked about her visit to Kabul where she was embedded with the American military. I have been a huge fan of the American humor. I still am. I kind of understand how it works, especially if it goes beyond humor.

In the show, Kathy portrayed Muslims in Kabul as dirty, filthy, unworthy to speak to Muslims. She proudly described a young American soldier, describing an Afghani man's hand dirty with his crap. As if "he crapped in his own hands and did not clean it up afterwards." O.K. now, it is known in Islam that when people go to the restrooms, they MUST clean themselves up with water, something some other cultures do not preach. So describing that man with crap in his hand makes no sense, unless he was retarded, which was not the case because she described him as a sane man who wanted to shake her hands and take a picture with her.

That was not funny. It was disrespectful.

The second thing is that she forced a religious Muslim man to look into her eyes, yelling at him that she is a woman and he has to look into her eyes. I do not support those men who do not look women in the eyes, but it's not something I can control or make fun of. It's this man's culture and adherence to his religion that made him do this. It would be disrespectful to force him do what he does not believe in. It would be like forcing a Buddhist worship Jesus or Mohammed or even God. You cannot disrespect people who adhere to their religions. You can disagree, but not make fun of.

So, a little advice here: make sure you know the cultures of the countries you are visiting and try to respect them. When you respect others, you are respected.

blog.bassamsebti@gmail.com

Saturday, July 12, 2008

Iraqi Refugees, Enemies?

It is really sad to see an American think of an Iraqi refugee as an enemy. This is either ignorance or simple hatred or maybe both. Iraqis who had suffered under Saddam had suffered even more when the U.S. invaded and occupied their country. Hundreds of thousands were kidnapped, tortured, beheaded, displaced and even buried alive in mass graves since the war started five years ago. And for what? For a war based on lies and private interests. And yet, there is this American woman named Bertha Avila from Marysville who is shocked to see Iraqis, whose lives were destroyed because of her country, being resettled and compensated for what they lost in Iraq.

What Bertha doesn’t seem to understand or maybe doesn’t seem to want to understand is that once upon a time those Iraqis had a relatively normal life compared to their destroyed life after her country invaded theirs. It is the least thing the U.S. could do to atone itself for what it did to those people’s lives. Those were doctors, engineers, teachers, dentists, … etc. They are not enemies; they are the remaining seeds of a better future that for a while seemed dim.

Read Bertha’s letter below:

Letter: Why is U.S. aiding Iraqi refugees?

The Department of Homeland Security has recently allowed refugees from Iraq to settle in our country through a program called U.S. Refugee Admission Program, and as of June 4, 6,480 Iraqis have been admitted into the USA and an additional 27,940 Iraqis referred to DHS for interviews, with approvals growing each day.

Iraq was considered a global terrorist threat. We go to war to prevent terrorism and then we turn around and welcome their displaced citizens into this country giving them special visas and loans to travel and all the benefits such as welfare, food and medical services while our own government is facing a recession?

I am puzzled and can't understand the fairness of this country. One day U.S. sons and daughters fighting in this bloody war will come home to be neighbors with the sons and daughters of the of the enemy enjoying the benefits they will only hope for.

Go to www.USCIS.gov and read all about this program.

Bertha Avila
Marysville
Blog.bassamsebti@gmail.com

Tuesday, July 8, 2008

Used, Then Thrown Like Cigarettes

They were used like cigarettes and when they were in no use any more, they were thrown in the streets to be crushed by the bystanders. Those are the Iraqi army veterans who once threw their lives in the frontlines, defending their country and fighting the fiercest terrorists of our world. Instead of being rewarded for their bravery, they were ignored and forgotten.

The New York Times
published a heart-wrenching story about those wounded Iraqi army veterans and the horrible treatment they received by the Iraqi government after they were wounded.

Nubras Jabar Muhammad, a 26-year-old soldier, was shot by a sniper in May 2007 as he was on duty at a Baghdad checkpoint. He nearly bled to death, losing a kidney and part of his liver, while suffering damage to his right hand. His torso is scarred, and two fingers are locked in a permanent curl.

He says he still has shrapnel lodged in his back, and rarely sleeps through the night. He has trouble digesting food. But the army refused him a disability pension, claiming he was able-bodied, and he was forced to return to active duty after nine months. He says he has already spent about $2,100 of his own money on operations, selling jewelry and a pistol to raise the cash.

Though he had instructions from his doctors to avoid standing for long periods, the army quickly returned him to checkpoint duty, where he is on his feet all day long in temperatures up to 120 degrees. "I demanded that my superiors give me a desk job," Mr. Muhammad said. "They told me if I keep complaining, they'll kick me out of the army."

blog.bassamsebti@gmail.com

Sunday, July 6, 2008

The Bullies' New Fight

When Saddam said he would fight the Americans fiercely if attacked he was just bluffing. He didn’t have anything to fight them with. Iran’s officials are saying the same if attacked by the U.S. and Israel. However, the equation is not similar. Iran is not Saddam’s Iraq. It’s much stronger.

Last Saturday, The Independent reported that Iran would attack back if attacked. The paper quoted the head of Iran's Revolutionary Guard, Mohammed Jafari saying, "Iran's response to any military action will make the invaders regret their decision and action." The same thing was mentioned in an interview conducted by the Washington Post’s Thomas Erdbrink's with Mojtaba Samareh Hashemi, special adviser to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. “As has been said before: Any government that tries to invade Iran will regret its actions,” said Hashemi.
Is that possible? I guess it is. Since the end of its war with Iraq in 1988, Iran has not been directly involved in any war. During all these years, their industry-militarily and socially- grew greatly due to the self-sufficient policy the country has adapted. It’s a wealthy country and is easily capable of depending on this wealth to improve their military.

If attacked, I believe Iran would really retaliate. Their military is not as ill-equipped as Iraq’s under Saddam. Let’s not forget that Saddam’s air force was banned and that was one of the strongest reasons why he lost when Iraq was invaded by the U.S.-led forces. Iran, on the other hand, does have the ability to fight the Americans or the Israelis by air force. If so, the results would not be easy or simple. Iran can easily fly over Iraq and bombard American military bases, while others would spray Israel- which is not far from Iran- with a string of rockets and missiles that would horrify the Jewish nation’s people who are already terrified of the small rockets launched by Hezbollah and Hamas.

Iraq, of course, will be in the middle. There is nothing more to be done by then. I suspect the Americans would regret the day they supported Maliki, his government and the Shiite-majority parliament. Maliki has just said his stance on all of this fuss: his government would not allow Iraq to become a launching pad for an attack on its neighbor. Of course, it wouldn’t. Iran has been a major role player in the Iraqi politics since Saddam was even in power. When he was ousted, Iraq became officially in the hands of the Iranian regime like candy in a basket. Very simple, and yet the Americans still do not get it. In his book “War Journal,” Richard Engel wrote about this issue which most Americans did not even consider worthy thinking about. The war made Iran very happy because they toppled their long-term enemy and brought their fellow Shiites to power. Now, if the Americans launched strikes from Iraqi lands, this would make the Americans big liars because they stressed on the fact that Iraq is sovereign and no longer occupied by them. It’s not like Qatar, Kuwait or Saudi Arabia whose governments did let them launch their rockets from their lands. I doubt Maliki or any Shiite politicians approve attacks from Iraqi lands. But if they do, Iranians will consider them betrayers of the nation that hosted them during their struggle against Saddam.

In the end, not only Americans and Israelis would suffer the hard strikes Iran would launch, but also the Iraqi people would because they are going to be stuck in the middle. It’s been five years since they never felt peace, and more wars would drag them again into another well of bombardments and strikes. I believe Shiite militiamen who have been well-trained by Iran would not sit back and watch. They will be on their trainers’ side, of course. That’s the whole objective of why they were trained, in addition to weaken the Americans in Iraq. Along their side, I think Sunni insurgents would seize the opportunity of the Americans’ vulnerability and fight them fiercely. They hate the Shiites but as it is said, “the enemy of my enemy is my friend.” Then, Iraq would be dragged again into another wave of disasters, wiping off all the efforts to stabilize it.

The problem in this issue is that all sides involved (Iran, Israel and the U.S.) are arrogant bullies. It looks like fourth grade kids fighting outside their school’s yard, except that this one may include rockets, tanks, and warplanes. None of them understands that they will all hurt their people. In my opinion, they should sit down and negotiate before they drag the world into another bloody war. The world has witnessed enough wars and needs a break. It really does.

Sunday, June 22, 2008

Welcoming Iraqi Refugees in the City of Brotherly Love

Yesterday (June 21st) I was invited to speak at the first-of-its-kind conference in the City of Brotherly Love. The Philadelphia-held conference was an open-borders event between the newly arrived Iraqi refugees to the Philadelphia area and their new American friends and neighbors.

The conference coincided with the June 20th World Refugee Day and was held by one of Philadelphia’s oldest non-profit organization, the Nationalities Service Center. Since it was founded in 1921, NSC made great achievements in terms of helping refugees from all over the world. It provides legal, social and educational services to immigrants, refugees, limited and/or non-English speakers.

The conference which was called “Welcoming Iraqi Families, Celebrating Iraqi Culture” was a step a great step NSC chose to take in order to build bridges between the American and Iraqi cultures. People from the two countries interacted and shared stories about their homelands. One of the Iraqi refugees, an artist, donated two paintings representing images from his home country, attracting a great admiration by the American Philadelphians who rarely get a chance to see Iraqi art. Others expressed their feelings about finding a new and safe home, and how they lived in their homeland before, during and after the war. Read More...

blog.bassamsebti@gmail.com

Tuesday, June 17, 2008

Saudi Woman's Rebellion

My Saudi friend Ali has forwarded me a very interesting essay that I thought of sharing with you. As we all know, feminism in Saudi Arabia is locked behind the iron prison bars of the extremist Wahabi clerics and the male-dominant culture that crippled the other half of humanity component.


I translated the essay into English, but I have to say it is more powerful to read in Arabic. It is the best essay I have ever read by a Saudi woman against gender discrimination in her country. My Iraqi friend Zainab, who once wore a headscarf, also wrote about her opinion regarding her decision to take the scarf off when she left the country a few years ago.

I am No Longer Ashamed!
By Nadine al-Bdair

The story started when I was destined to mourning, when they drew the black and forced me to wear it, making the city look even darker.

In her childhood, the young girl did not care about her body because it was a source of smiles. But if she is gets taller, her feminineness becomes a source of a scandal, and all what she has becomes bad and disgrace. She becomes ashamed of her body. Therefore, she helped them wrap it. She covered her mouth, blinded her eyes, hid her fingers in the darkness, and widened the cloth on her chest, waist and legs. Only through the cloth she got hot and suffocated air, that felt exactly like her.
--
I became eleven years-old. My voice was a shame.

Women in my family said, “Women’s voice is one of the reasons of her honor. Whenever it gets louder, she is less respected. She has to whisper.”
That means my voice is a sin.

They also said that my looks are sins, and so does my laughter.

They said that the honor of the society lies between the thighs of its women. The men’s honor would be gone with one smile from me. ALL the men’s honor would be gone with the first eye contact I do with a man I like. They said women’s virginity is a source of proverbs.

These were women who told me to be bashful from the requirements of nature. These were women who taught me how to stick my eyes to the floor.

At age fifteen, the Religion [female] teachers who are obsessed with religion stressed that the girls who do not cover their heads in life will be hanged by it in the afterlife.

So my hair became a sin.

Once, a teacher swore that the face of the women was created to have it exclusively enjoyed by the husband. Every woman’s job would be done by surrendering her body to a [husband].

I wish I asked her, “what if I weren’t married?” What should I do with my face, the enjoyment tool that I possess?

I grew up and the mosque imam’s voice made its way to my ears every Friday, distracting me from my studies with his entertaining tales, swearing hundreds of times that a woman’s body is a curse that should be removed from life.

Now all of me is a sin. So why were I created? Is that why they chose the black [dress] for me? To mourn coming to this world as a woman?

How were I convinced to be ashamed and bashful instead of being proud of this universal miracle?

The most important question is when did the woman start being ashamed of her presence?
For me all I know is that they included the woman’s period in religion classes, which I memorized. It mentioned that I have to live several days of every month “dirty.”

I searched the word’s meaning in different Arabic dictionaries where I found all synonyms for this word mean “filthy.” I then became ashamed. How could I not when I was the filthy? I am not clean and pure creature.

Then I wandered in the world and saw…

I saw the statues of the ancient gods naked. I saw women’s bodies sculptured in the streets and roads and on the walls of the caves and inside the castles and mansions in a scared way. Everybody mastered art in sculpturing my body which carries that miracle of creation, the symbol of birth, the body that the ancient statue worshipers could not hide their admiration of. They worshipped it and considered it sacred.

I imagined the fate of these statues if they were created in our region. I imagined them destroyed and covered with cloth. I even imagined them as a source of respecting society that respects women’s bodies instead of hiding them.

How the ancient glorified my body and how my people destroyed it!

I won’t take part in this sin. I won’t mourn.

I returned back to my society where men boast their open chests while women boast of how large their dresses cloths are. Even though the logic says that I should cover my body, men should do the same to be ashamed of their bodies, because women’s bodies are more beautiful. Beauty is the thing that should be all over the streets, not the opposite.

I returned back and saw the cloths are the main scale to distinguish between people and be against all human rights. Some meters of cotton are enough to judge on the women wearing it whether she is good or bad. That woman is good because she wrapped herself well. That one is on her way to be good. She still needs to cover her eyes and follow the path of purity. And regarding that one, God keeps away from her, walks and big parts of her chest are shown.
Cotton and silk… These are the scales of manners for us, as long as everything is happening inside and not shown to public.

The first society slap I ever got was when I was in high school whose teachers were extremely religious. I was always shy to go to school because it was decided to put on the Abayas that all students would go to paradise and only me and my other friend would go to hell where we are going to be grilled and our meat would be eaten by beasts.
I envied them because I was not one of them.

One day, one of my classmates asked me to call her boyfriend and tell him about the next meeting’s place because her phone was not working.

“How come you do such a thing and you are the pure and bashful girl who does not even show her hands and feet?” I asked.

“What does that have to do with what I am doing? You are an infidel if you don’t wear a scarf and leave your body open to strangers to see,” she replied.

These are the scales of manners here: as long as things happen secretly. As long as the body is all covered, [you can do whatever you want].
--
The same body remains whether inside or outside the fences [of clothes]. What I care about today is the outside, when the man speaks loudly and sings while shaving, by the time we whisper when we pick our brows . We whisper when our bloodshed comes. We hide the best proof of life and its continuation on earth.

Because whispering is a proof of a sin and because I am not a sin, because I am a miracle, I will speak loudly to make humans hear me. I will laugh and unveil my presence to enjoy myself, not a man.

An American journalist once asked me in an interview, “Why do you wear high heels? You don’t need that.”

I told him, “The most thing I like about high heels is that when I walk in a hallway and make my steps movement be heard. People at the end of hallway would stop chatting to know who that high-heel-woman coming. This is the means I use in the environment of a culture that is ashamed of my presence. The culture that considered women’s high heels a disgraceful thing. This is my means to tell them that my body is moving and this movement is making this sound.

blog.bassamsebti@gmail.com

Thursday, June 12, 2008

Richard Engel's "War Journal"

More and more frequently since I have started reading books about the Middle East and Iraq I have begun to see how Iraq has been shaped and changed. For the last five years, I read several books. Before those five years, I poured most of my attention on literature, avoiding anything that has to do with politics, especially Saddam’s in order to survive. The books I read were mostly written by journalists who spent quite a long time in Iraq before, during and after the invasion. In this thread, I would like to reflect my opinion about a book I have just finished reading. “War Journal: My Five Years in Iraq” by the newly-promoted NBC reporter Richard Engel.

After reading Shadid’s “Night Draws Near,” Chandrasekaran’s “Emperial Life in the Emerald City,” and Packer’s “The Assassin’s Gate” I thought no other journalist than those three could write about Iraq the way they did. But after reading Engel’s I discovered I was wrong.

The book is a must read for every American or non-American who wants to know what went wrong and what happened as a result of that.

One of my graduation presents was a Borders Bookstore gift card. Instead of buying something that might be forgotten pretty soon, I decided to buy a book. When I went to Borders, I found many interesting titles attracting my attention like a desperate child grabbing his father’s sleeves to buy him candy. On the shelf of the ‘Memoirs and Biographies’ sat ‘War Journal,’ shining with a crystal clear picture of Richard Engel. The young American reporter was standing in what I believe the area facing al-Hamra hotel where his NBC’s office was located, the same place where a truck suicide bomber destroyed part of the hotel and the collapsed the surrounding apartment buildings. Because I stood on that particular spot before and after it was destroyed, my eyes couldn’t resist gazing at the picture. I wasn’t looking at Engel, more than on the destroyed building and the three children playing behind him among the rubble and the concrete barriers that were smartly hidden by the photographer.

In the photo, Engels eyes gave me several impressions. I am kind of a mind a look ‘reader.’ I judge on people when I see how they react to something through their look. You can lie or do a certain gesture, but your eyes can never lie. Engels’ eyes gave me two impressions: one of a ‘cocky’ reporter who stayed long enough to understand what Iraq and Iraqis are really like in the war. The other was that of someone fatigued, stressed out, and kind of sad.

I let my fingers leaf through the pages of the book until my eyes impeded, catching something that summed up what I and many other Iraqi bloggers had been talking about regarding the elections in Iraq. “Millions [of Iraqis] did in fact turn out,” Engel wrote. “but they weren’t embracing democracy. They were just following orders…” he added. That very statement made decide to buy the book, even though it cost more than the value of the gift card.

I was curious to know why he gave such a statement that most pro-war Americans would slam him for!

The book’s title made me buy it too in order to see his own perspective and how he felt as a reporter and a human being in covering the war. After all, I was one. But my case was kind of different. I was watching the war as an Iraqi and a journalist. I saw my country destroyed in front of my eyes.

Engel’s first two chapters were not emotional as you would expect in reading a journal or a memoir. It was more like analytical statements in a history book, not in a journal. But when I moved on in reading the rest of the book I found out that the flow of the events and the way they are described in connection to his own feeling was more interesting than I expected it to be. I think the first ‘boring’ chapters were actually preparing me, the reader, to see how things happened. Eventually, I understood why it appeared to be so. I might be wrong, but I think there was a reason.

The book starts with the scene where he was covering Saddam’s capture like a rat in a hole. I bet I don’t need to describe how that happened, because if you don’t know how it happened, we have a problem. The chapter was detailed, well backgrounded and to the point, but it had no emotion. But the moment you leap to the third chapter, things start to move a little more interesting. Engel connects his work life, including his bureau and staff members with what was happening around them in the to be war-torn Baghdad.

We all know sequence of the events that happened since the invasion, I hope. Engel makes sure you DO know. He does that by a very clear timeline sequence of one event that led to the other like a chain reaction. He starts it with the fact that the Sunnis discovering they were no longer the men-in-power and how in contrary to that Shiites WERE in fact the ones to be in charge. He writes about it in extensive details starting from the Governing Council ending with the consequences of the “Iranian-monitored” and “American-backed” elections.

Engel continues writing by mentioning that how the Sunnis became frustrated, knowing that the Shiites were going to win in the elections because they were the majority. So they decided to boycott and turn to insurgency where bloodthirsty al-Qaeda was waiting for a chance to impose its terror power in Iraq. Who else other than the Shiite “infidels” deserves to be attacked the most? As a result, Shiite militiamen did not stand still and started attacking back. In the middle innocent people died from both sects died, of course.

Engel did an amazing job in describing one of the scariest nightmares Iraq had ever gone through. Ibrahim Jaafari, the “elected” Prime Minister of Iraq. He compared him to his competitor at the time, Ayad Allawi, who was liked by many Iraqis for his strong personality. By nature, we Iraqis do not like sissies, soft spoken, and delicate leaders. Jaafari was that kind of a ‘leader.’ The best part written about Jaafari was that when a Kurdish politician told Engel, “You can’t get answers from him. All he does is he talks philosophy.” Engel wrote, “Iraq didn’t need a philosopher. It needed a leader.” I totally agree.

When you keep reading, you could definitely tell how things were declining from bad to worse to the worst. Engel does it in a very clear and simple way, unlike many books that were written about Iraq. He does it like a story, unlike his first chapters. His tone of writing changes that sometimes I feel that he actually wrote those exact words in a notebook. He mentioned that he kept a video journal. So that might be it.

By 2006, Engels tone could be barely recognized the same. He writes in details how he didn’t care less when he saw dead, rotten and burned bodies and destroyed buildings. I read that part and remembered how I had the exact same feeling when I was there working for the Washington Post. But I left in mid 2006 and came to the U.S. to pursue a Master’s degree. I had nightmares. I jumped every time I heard thunder or ambulance sirens. It took me two years to heal, that’s if I am healed. But the other day I was in Washington DC and something happened that made reconsider knowing myself, my old self. One evening when I was coming back from the Metro station to my friends place, I happened to witness something terrible. I was with a friend of mine when I heard people screaming and gathering to see what happened on the first floor of the station. I peered and saw a young athletic man in blue shirt and brown pants lying on the floor bleeding from his head while he was motionless. There was a young blond woman weeping and screaming next to him while other people were calling for ambulance. I saw the man lying on his back (his head was facing the ceiling), but he seemed he was still alive since his abdomen was moving up and down.. When I saw the man the first time, I didn't have the "normal" feeling I had in Baghdad two years ago. This time, I felt really normal. I was shocked like everybody in the station. I had this horrible feeling of a man dying in front of me. If I were in Iraq, I would have moved on and might not even think about for more than a minute, but that incident haunted me. It was a sad incident but it made me realize that I am finally "recovered." I have my senses back. I felt like a normal person again. It was such a strange feeling I never expected.

I wonder how long it’s going to take Engel to “recover.” War is always ugly. It affects the core of your soul, no matter how strong you are.

The best time to read is when you travel, I believe. I went to Washington D.C. again, volunteering to help The List Project and Upwardly Global with their career summit they held for Iraqi professionals who were resettled in the United States recently after receiving death threats back home. I took the cheap, 15-dollar Chinatown bus to get there. On the way, I was still reading the book and was in the final chapters of it. Engels tone became even sadder. He recalled and described stories that no human being could ever endure seeing. Stories that not even people would watch in horror movies. The collapse, the control of the outlaws, the segregation, the displacement and the monstrous way of killing people. He talked about orphans, his own employees’ self destruction, and mostly HIS own destruction: his divorce.

At the end Engel meets with his country’s ill-famed president. He shoots his words and facts in the best interview with Bush I have ever read. Bush admits to Engel that the war was more like a personal decision than a long-range strategy for the Middle East. "I know people are saying we should have left things the way they were,” Bush tells Engel. “but I changed after 9/11. I had to act. I don't care if it created more enemies. I had to act."

As a result to that action, more than 4 million Iraqis became refugees, hundreds of thousands died, more than 4,000 American soldiers lost their lives in vague-aimed war and hatred against the American nation increased because of that ‘war on terror.’ But who cares? The president didn’t for sure. He had to act!

blog.bassamsebti@gmail.com

Tuesday, June 10, 2008

A New, Changing World

Nearly seven years ago, the world stood still. Two towers were making their way down, collapsing metal, glass, and most importantly innocent people. Two hijackers made that happen, destroying not only the lives of three thousand people, but also hundreds of thousands across the Atlantic Ocean. Since then, the map of the world changed, not geographically but politically.

The United States launched its “War on Terror,” making Jihadi terrorists’ dream come true: a declared, open war on Muslim lands face-to-face. The war had become even fiercer and bloodier. It cost the world its shape, dignity, and peace.

Bush had called America’s friends and allies join with all those who want peace and security. “We stand together to win the war against terrorism,” he said. But did those whom he called for stood together with him against the enemies of peace? Understandably, they did. They supported the war in Afghanistan against the Taliban repressive and backwards regime, a war I strongly supported for there is nothing in the world is worse than being ruled by religious fanatic regimes. The war then was one of the very first things that changed the world we had lived in. Then came the unexpected Iraq war.

The unprepared Iraq war and the malfunctions that accompanied its poor plans (that’s if there were any plans) had changed the world into even a worse shape than it used to be. Thousands of Jihadis entering Iraq, the start of insurgency, the civil war, the tyrant’s execution… etc. During the five-years of the ongoing war, this small part of the world called Iraq changed. Forever. It broke like a mug. Many people tried to glue it back, but in vain. Even if we glued it again, would it look the same? I don’t think so.

The civil war changed the formerly mixed Baghdad and turned it into a city of segregated neighborhoods manned by concrete walls, worse than that in Palestine. The country as a whole is no longer the same. Each province is now called by its people’s ethnicity, religion or sect. Politics became random. Democracy is achieved, but in a wrong way. Instead of depending on the educated elite, the Americans backed and installed a sectarian electoral system, that is of voting for sects and ethnicities instead of professionals and good leaders. That, of course, changed the Iraqi politics world. It became separated more than united, spoiling the people’s sacrifice when they went to polling centers.

America itself changed. Maybe dramatically! There is a big divide between the country’s divided politicians and people. The war made thousands of Americans go to a war that had nothing to do with the day the world stood still. America’s image in front of the world changed as well. The world realized that what they see in Hollywood movies is not similar to what is happening in reality. American politics now changed as well. Diplomatic relations are no longer the same. Oil prices are soaring high. Food has become so expensive that in some countries like Egypt people died while fighting to get some pieces of bread. (Of course, this news did not make its way to the Americans because Mubarrak is the good ol’ friend of the Americans and Israelis. So to hell with Egyptians) Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Iran and many other countries have fallen in this huge political earthquake that plagued the world. Earth is spinning, but faster than we realize. Its horrific speedy change is affecting everyone everywhere.

--

Despite all disasters, wars, and hatred among the earth’s population, there is still a tunnel that is leading to another different direction. We are driving in it and taking benefit out of it without noticing how fast it has improved our life styles and how easier (in one way or another) it has become to live, work, and even socialize. Technology is that wide and long tunnel. It’s rapid, ongoing development has made it impossible for us to live like our parents and grandparents lived decades ago. I can’t even imagine how my grandfather did not have a computer like the one I’m using now.

The world is moving forward shaping earth flatly, metaphorically speaking. For instance in his international bestseller “The World is Flat,” Thomas Friedman analyzed the progress of globalization. In the book, he suggests the world is "flat" in the sense that globalization has leveled the competitive playing fields between industrial and emerging market countries. In his opinion, this flattening is a product of a convergence of personal computer with fiber-optic micro cable with the rise of work flow software.

This globalization and technology has made it even easier for others to live and even survive. Science and medicine have become even better. It’s even progressing as you are reading this sentence. There are doctors and scientists who are using this rapid development in technology as a main tool in finding many ways to cure patients.

--

“Now that we know better, let’s live better” is a sentence I read once and was stuck in my mind. Knowing is living. That’s why I chose to change my blog’s name and direction. In order to better understand the world better, I thought of not only concentrating on issues related to Iraq but also those from different spots on earth of which I come across as well. Sharing opinions respectfully is the best way to make this mission succeed. The world is improving, but it also decaying and collapsing and it’s in our hands to prevent that from happening, or at least try.

Every individual and human being on earth has been affected by the world’s change. Our lives are no longer the same. Mine for instance has been marked with wars, sanctions, blood, displacement, and suffering but it’s been also marked with success. The world I knew in my childhood years was different than that of my teenage years. Now, it is entirely different from those two. My world is a new world. Our world is a new world.

bassamsebti@hotmail.com

Sunday, May 18, 2008

Iraqi Blogger Killed in Baghdad


Such an incredibly sad story. The Iraqi blogsphere has lost one of its members, BlogIraq. I can't offer anything here except my sorrow and anger at what life has turned to be.

May those who killed him never feel peace.

Find details here: http://www.blogiraq.info/2008/05/16/blogiraq-is-dead/

baghdadtreasure@gmail.com

Monday, May 5, 2008

One of the One Hundred

This morning while I was making some tea for breakfast, my landlord’s copy of Time magazine drew my attention. The issue was a special edition that presented the world’s 100 most influential figures. As I was leafing through the magazine, I saw that an Iraqi woman was considered one of those influential figures. Seeing this made my day. It left me with a sense of optimism that despite all the horror Iraqis are going through under occupation and terrorism, there are people like this woman whose efforts are like bricks rebuilding what was destroyed.


Madeeha Hasan Odhaib

By Queen Rania

It's not every day that success stories echo out of Iraq into the halls of power, but Madeeha Hasan Odhaib defies the norm. Armed with her sewing machine, unflinching stoicism and determination, Madeeha, 37, is mending the fabric of Iraq.

Four years ago, this mother of two and seamstress turned district council member took three sewing machines, leveraged them into 60 and built a business sewing hospital sheets and flags. She now employs 100 women. That figure may seem insignificant compared with the accomplishments of other achievers on TIME's list. But in a country with more than 60% unemployment and rampant poverty, such efforts provide a lifeline. Each woman Madeeha employs returns home with an invaluable sense of self-respect, money in her purse, food for her children and optimism for a daughter desperately seeking a role model amid mayhem. Madeeha also treads—or, rather, threads—the line between activism and heroism. She has coordinated with the Red Crescent, Red Cross, Hands of Mercy and Iraqi army to distribute food around Baghdad. And despite threats, she says she'll never give up.

Iraq is suffering one of the worst humanitarian crises we have ever seen. While Madeeha rightly makes Time's list, women like her are found throughout Iraq, sewing hope one stitch at a time. Through Madeeha, we celebrate all of Iraq's courageous women, whose resilience and resourcefulness hold the promise of a new dawn.

Queen Rania of Jordan is a champion of women's rights in the Middle East


Friday, May 2, 2008

ABC Report Belittles Iraqis’ Feelings

As I was flipping through the TV channels last night, I saw a 6abc report about Iraq. The report was not about Iraqi people; it was about Iraqi stray dogs.

The anchors of the five-minute report called its subject "an extraordinary story." Stray dogs are being flown from Iraq by airplanes to the U.S. to be adopted by U.S. military servicemen and women, and sometimes by the private security contractors whom we all know how they behave with humans in Iraq. Each dog brought costs the U.S. $1,200. The military men and women do not have to pay for that. Volunteers from across the U.S. donate hundreds of dollars to save these pups.

By the time millions of Iraqi civilians have become refugees inside and outside Iraq, the perpetrators of the war have the guts to show up on TV and say they are paying thousands of dollars to save some stray dogs. Instead of helping those who were affected by their war, the Americans are helping cats and dogs. I wonder how those who worked for the Americans and risked their lives without any appreciation would feel after seeing this “operation”!

The report did not only belittle the feeling of suffering Iraqis, it also provided Americans with false information and facts about how dogs are treated in Iraq. The female anchor proudly and sadly said, “[Iraqi] children are taught that animals are dangerous.” It is such an outrageous lie. Yes, I didn’t have a pet at home, but many of my friends and relatives did. My parents, for instance, had never ever taught me to hate or abuse an animal. In schools under Saddam, we were taught that we should not harm animals and should always be compassionate to them, because that’s what Islam teaches. The other lie was that there are little veterinaries in Iraq. Oh! I wonder how we have our dogs and cats and other animals vaccinated then?! They might even think in a mosque or in tent in the desert. Oh, they might even think we didn’t have tap water to clean them with and that we wash them in the Tigris!

This was really outrageous. Shame on abc and their local crew in Philadelphia for not checking facts. The American media keeps deceiving its own people with things that have no relativity to reality. Now they reached farther than deception. They are belittling the feelings of the millions of people suffering under their occupation.

And you tax payers, go save the next stray dog and let human beings die in hundreds. Good for you. Good for America.



baghdadtreasure@gmail.com

Thursday, May 1, 2008

After Years of Humiliation, Journalists Released

Aljazeera’s Sami Alhajj is finally released. It’s the second good news I heard this month. The first one was the release of Bilal Hussein, the Associated Press cameraman. Alhajj and Hussein were detained by the U.S. government for six and two years of ordeal, respectively without any charges.

I can’t even imagine the amount of degrading these journalists and many others had to go though in the U.S. prisons for no reason. These journalists were held captives for years, deprived of their rights, their families, children and most importantly their dignity. What has the U.S. gained from imprisoning innocent journalists for years without any charges?

This leaves me questioning the kind of freedom of speech the U.S. always claims to own and the “humanitarian” and “civil” treatment it always claims to have.


baghdadtreasure@gmail.com

Saturday, April 26, 2008

Restoring Iraq's Treasure

Hundreds of artifacts, looted in the wake of the US-led invasion of Iraq, have been returned to the country, but many more remain missing, stolen from Iraq's ancient sites.

Al Jazeera's Owen Fay, reporting from Baghdad, looks at the efforts to safeguard Iraq's cultural heritage.




baghdadtreasure@gmail.com

Monday, April 14, 2008

Five Years on ... Lifetime for Iraqis

I wasn’t prepared for what I read, couldn’t even believe that I read it correctly and that it could be our fate as well. His words shock, but I found them so real. It was a blow, a reminder, and a desperate call.

While waiting for some friends at the coffee shop this morning, I browsed the internet in search of news, maybe hopeful ones. Yet, one article took me thousands of miles away, to Iraq. The article was about the 33rd anniversary of the start of Lebanon’s civil war. In a televised speech, Lebanese Prime Minister, Fouad al-Sanyoora, said, "Today, after 33 years of wounds, we are still suffering and we haven't recovered from its effects, pains and memories."

I took a sip from my coke and leaned back on the chair and gazed off nowhere in particular. His words took me 17 years back. I was in a taxi cab with my mother, shortly after the 1991 U.S. led war destroyed our country’s infrastructure in response to Saddam’s invasion of Kuwait. My mother was still hopeful that the destroyed buildings we passed by would be rebuilt and Iraq would restore its power and life. The cab driver sounded pessimistic. I was only 11 years-old then and had no idea how cruel life could be. He told my mother, “We could easily rebuild the buildings and the bridges, but how are we going to heal people’s wounds?” Seventeen years passed and his words still ring in my mind.

It was different. My mother was right. Things got better in terms of buildings and the cab driver was right as well. But that was not a civil war and things were not as bad as they were during Lebanon’s civil war. Now it is. Chaos, blood, refugees, occupation, revenge … But it’s been only five years. Would it continue to fifteen more years like how it happened in Lebanon? I think it would. All politicians are caring about is their benefits and loyalty to their religions, ethnicities and sects rather than the country itself.

The entire coffee shop seemed quiet for a minute. People were talking but I wasn’t listening. I just saw their mouths opened and closed and there was a killing silence, one that makes you feel you were in a nightmare trying to say something or hear something but you can’t. I tried to imagine the future, but forced myself not to. Too much pain to carry to that ambiguous future.

Last Wednesday marked the fifth anniversary of Saddam’s fall. Five years passed and the train of pain and mayhem is still going on and on and on. It doesn’t even seem it is going to stop. I am afraid that this war is going to take us as far as the war took the Lebanese. Life of Iraqis is already destroyed, tainted with mayhem and ongoing horror that forced millions to immigrate, seeking a safe roof to cover their bare heads.

A few hours ago, I was surfing Youtube about Iraq and found an astonishing series of documentaries and news reports on Aljazeera International Youtube page. The one that shook me off and chilled my entire spine was called “Witness,” a nightly weekday documentary series, presented by the former BBC reporter Rageh Omaar.

Unlike everyday, Omaar was the one to be the witness on that show. In 2003, he covered the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq. Five years later, he visited Baghdad and saw how things dramatically changed. In part three of the series, he interviewed an Iraqi friend of his who was kidnapped and tortured by insurgents who also forced him unwillingly to watch them behead another hostage. The way they both narrated the story left me motionless, eyes wide-open and mouth open. It could have been me to be beheaded or forced to watch the beheading. As I was watching I thanked God a hundred times for protecting me and my family from such horror.

The other series were those of Iraqi translators’ lives and the lives of the Iraqis in general during five years of ongoing war. Below are the most interesting videos I found where Iraqis’ real life has no space or little attention on American media.

Working in a War Zone: Life for many in Iraq has been a daily struggle to survive. Some jobs have opened up and local Iraqis have found a platform to perform. However, not every one has an exactly hassle-free job. A journalist and a translator with the American army describe their experiences of working in Iraq.

Witness - Return to Iraq: Witness presenter Rageh Omaar returned to Iraq five years after reporting on the US-led invasion. He found much had changed and, as ordinary Iraqis told him, rarely for the better.

Witness - Return to Iraq - Part 1

Witness - Return to Iraq - Part 2

Witness - Return to Iraq - Part 3

Witness - Return to Iraq - Part 4

Failing health care in Iraq - 20 Mar 08: Five years after the invasion, Iraq's health care system remains in crisis. Hospitals have to deal with the aftermath of bombs and shootings on a daily basis. It is very hard for doctors to do their job. They often lack basic equipment and the necessary drugs to treat the injured. And many health workers have just been murdered or kidnapped.

Like Omaar said in Witness, “for so many [in Iraq], the last five years have been a lifetime.”

baghdadtreasure@gmail.com